Before You Invest in Sudan’s Minerals, Understand This One Rule

Every mining investment begins with a fundamental question:

Who owns the minerals?

Before geological modelling, before feasibility studies, before financing structures—there must be legal clarity on ownership.

Article 8 of the Sudanese Mineral Wealth and Mining Development Act 2015 provides that clarity. It establishes that all mineral resources in Sudan—whether located on the surface, underground, in lakes, territorial waters or the continental shelf—belong to the State.

For international law firms, multinational mining companies, and institutional investors evaluating foreign investment in Sudan, this is not merely a technical provision. It is the legal foundation upon which every licence, contract and mining agreement is built.

What Article 8 Actually Provides (Translated and Explained)

Article 8 of the Sudanese Mineral Wealth and Mining Development Act 2015 contains four key principles:

1. State Ownership of All Mineral Resources

All mineral substances located within Sudan’s territory—including surface deposits, subsoil minerals, lakes, territorial waters and contiguous zones—are the property of the State.

The State retains the exclusive right to explore, exploit and dispose of mineral resources.

This confirms that private land ownership does not extend to mineral rights.

2. Presidential Authority to Restrict Exploration

Upon recommendation of the Minister, the President may prohibit exploration or prospecting for minerals deemed to be of strategic national importance.

In such cases, previously granted licences or mining contracts may be cancelled.

3. Compensation Mechanism and Arbitration

Where licences are cancelled under such authority, affected licence holders are entitled to fair compensation.

If compensation cannot be agreed, an arbitration panel is formed consisting of:

• A representative of the licence holder,
• A representative of the authority,
• A jointly agreed chairperson,

and the decision of that panel is final and binding.

4. Expropriation of Land for Mining Purposes

The President may expropriate land under the Land Acquisition Act of 1930 for mining purposes.

This ensures that land tenure conflicts do not paralyse strategic projects.

How Article 8 Compares with International Mining Practice

For foreign investors, state ownership of minerals may appear concerning. In reality, it is the global norm.

Across Africa, Latin America, Asia and even Europe, mineral resources are almost universally vested in the State. The rationale is straightforward: mineral resources are considered part of the national patrimony.

What differentiates jurisdictions is not whether the State owns minerals—but:

• The stability of the legal regime
• The predictability of compensation mechanisms
• The transparency of licensing procedures
• The credibility of dispute resolution

In this regard, Article 8 of the Sudanese Mineral Wealth and Mining Development Act 2015 aligns with international standards in three important ways:

1. Clear Legal Ownership Structure

There is no ambiguity regarding title. This reduces long-term legal disputes over subsurface ownership.

2. Recognition of Compensation Rights

The express reference to “fair compensation” and arbitration introduces a rule-based framework rather than discretionary confiscation.

In many emerging markets, compensation rights are implied. In Sudan, they are expressly stated in the statute.

3. Structured Executive Oversight

The ability to prohibit exploration for strategic minerals is common internationally. Strategic minerals—such as uranium, rare earths or other nationally sensitive resources—are frequently subject to additional control in various jurisdictions.

From a comparative law perspective, Article 8 does not depart from international practice. Instead, it places Sudan within the mainstream of resource governance models.

The Investor as the Hero, the Law as the Framework

Imagine an international mining company evaluating entry into Sudan.

The geological surveys are promising. The mineral potential is significant. But investors ask:

• Is ownership secure?
• Can licences be arbitrarily withdrawn?
• Is compensation enforceable?
• Is arbitration available?

Article 8 provides structured answers.

The investor is not purchasing the mineral itself. Instead, the investor obtains rights granted by the State under licence or contract. The value lies in the legal certainty of those granted rights.

When properly structured, mining contracts operate within the framework of state ownership—transforming sovereign mineral rights into commercially enforceable project rights.

This is where legal structuring becomes critical to enabling foreign investment in Sudan.

Economic Implications for Foreign Investment in Sudan

State ownership of minerals does not discourage investment. On the contrary, it can create:

• Centralised licensing authority
• Uniform regulatory standards
• Coordinated national mining policy
• Clear alignment between national development goals and private investment

For foreign investment in Sudan, Article 8 signals that mineral development is intended to operate within a sovereign-led but legally structured framework.

In jurisdictions where ownership is fragmented between private landowners and regional authorities, projects often stall due to competing claims. Sudan’s model reduces that fragmentation risk.

The key variable becomes governance and regulatory implementation—not ownership structure itself.

Managing Sovereign Risk: Practical Considerations for International Counsel

For international law firms advising clients on foreign investment in Sudan, Article 8 highlights several structuring priorities:

1. Robust Mining Agreements

Contracts should clearly define:

• Duration
• Work commitments
• Termination rights
• Compensation valuation methods
• Stabilisation provisions

2. Arbitration Clauses

Although Article 8 provides for arbitration in compensation disputes, investors should ensure broader contractual arbitration clauses are properly drafted and internationally enforceable.

3. Treaty Protection Analysis

Where applicable, investment treaty protection may provide an additional layer of security.

4. Due Diligence on Strategic Mineral Classifications

Investors should assess whether the targeted mineral could be designated as strategically restricted under presidential authority.

Why Article 8 Is Foundational to Sudan’s Mining Future

Article 8 of the Sudanese Mineral Wealth and Mining Development Act 2015 does more than define ownership. It establishes the legal architecture of Sudan’s mining sector.

It confirms:

• Sovereign control over natural resources
• Centralised authority over licensing
• Recognition of compensation principles
• Access to arbitration in disputes

For international investors, this framework provides both structure and predictability—two essential ingredients for bankable mining projects.

As Sudan continues to position its mineral wealth as a driver of economic growth, the clarity provided by Article 8 supports long-term planning and institutional investment.

Properly implemented, this framework can significantly enhance foreign investment in Sudan, particularly in gold, industrial minerals, rare earths and other strategic sectors.

Conclusion

Understanding Article 8 of the Sudanese Mineral Wealth and Mining Development Act 2015 is essential for any party considering mining activity in Sudan.

The law confirms that minerals belong to the State—but also provides mechanisms for licensing, compensation and arbitration that align with international practice.

For sophisticated investors, the question is not whether the State owns the minerals. It is whether the legal framework surrounding that ownership is clear, structured and enforceable.

At Sudanese Commercial Law Office (SCLO), we advise international law firms, foreign multinational companies and institutional investors on structuring mining projects, negotiating agreements and managing sovereign risk under the Sudanese Mineral Wealth and Mining Development Act 2015, enabling secure and compliant foreign investment in Sudan.

Disclaimer

This publication is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The content offers a general overview of the relevant legal framework and should not be relied upon as a substitute for specific legal advice tailored to particular facts or transactions.

If you require advice on any matter relating to Sudanese law, mining regulation, or foreign investment in Sudan, please contact Sudanese Commercial Law Office (SCLO) for professional assistance.

‍

‍